Geo-Politics of Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Status under the WTO and Future of Trade between India-Pakistan


  • Zahida Rashid Department of Political Science, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • A. Z. Hilali Department of Political Science, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.



Geo-politics, MFN, Trade Relations, Political Hurdles, Trade Barriers


This paper presents the impact of political decision on regional trade between India and Pakistan from the prospect of Pakistan Most Favoured Nation (MFN). The study is based on pre and post MFN status, which shows substantial evidence that Indian decision of declaring Pakistan as MFN in 1996 has shifted the dimension of trade in favour of India. The study is based on qualitative and descriptive analysis, which shows consumerism in Pakistan and its trend of Indian exports to Pakistan. The broad objective of study is aimed at analysing the possibility of trade between India and Pakistan under the world trading system. However, Pakistan exports to India are indifferent to Indian economic situation and Pakistan’s decision has insignificant impact on mutual trade. Thus, despite the volatile relationship, trade can play an important role for economic growth of Pakistan and the country can exploit the bigger market of India. Further, reduction in political tensions would eventually benefit both countries and means can generate larger benefits and trade facilitation measures. In this regard, trade routes should be opened, communications shall be restarted, and contracts should restore.


Metrics Loading ...


Aftab, M. (2016). SAARC Must End Non-Tariff Barriers,” Khaleej Times, September 25.

Amsden, A. H. (2003). Industrialization under new WTO law. Trade and development: directions for the 21st century, 82-99.

Ashraf, M. (2019, 5 September). “Pak-India trade realities,” The Express Tribune, Retrieved from

BBC News, (2019, August 7). “Kashmir Dispute: Pakistan downgrades ties with India” Retrieved from

Cebi, P., & Ludema, R. (2002). The rise and fall of the Most-Favoured-Nation clause (No. 1506-2016-130789).

Das, B. L. (1999). The World Trade Organisation: a guide to the new framework for international trade. Zed Books.

Dawn, (2016, September 18). “Non-Tariff Barriers Hampering Trade in South Asia” Retrieved from

Dawn, (2012, April). “India-Pakistan Trade via Attari Check Post”.

Department of Commerce: South Asia Division, Colombo (2017). India’s Trade with South Asia in 2016-2017: An Analysis. Retrieved from

Evans, P. B. (2018). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press.

Henderson, D. (1998). International agencies and cross-border liberalization: The WTO in context. In, Krueger, A. O. (1982). The WTO as an International Organisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hoekman, B. M., & Mavroidis, P. C. (2000). WTO dispute settlement, transparency, and surveillance. The World Economy, 23(4), 527-527.

Jackson, J. H. (1998). The world trade organization: constitution and jurisprudence (Vol. 89). London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Kaempfer, W. H., Tower, E., & Willett, T. D. (1989). Performance Contingent Protection. Economics & Politics, 1(3), 261-275.

Khan, A. H., & Ali, S. (1998). The Experience of Trade Liberalisation in Pakistan [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 661-685.

Krueger, A. O. (1982). The WTO as an International Organisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kugelman, M. (2016, March 14). “An optimist’s hope begins to fade,” Dawn.

Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little Brown.

Ramay, S. A. (2019). South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) and Implications for Pakistan. Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute.

Raihan, S. (2012). SAFTA and the South Asian countries: Quantitative assessments of potential implications.

Raiser, M. (2019, October 17). “China’s Rise Fits Every Development Model,” The Brookings Institution.

Ricardo, D. (1817). The works and correspondence of David Ricardo. In P. Sraffa. On the principles of political economy and taxation (John Murray, London).

Rosecrance, R. N. (1986). The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.

Sampson, G. P. (2002). “The World Trade Organization after Seattle”. The World Economy, 23(9), 111-23.

Sharma, M. & Kapoor, M. (2019, August 9). “Economically-ruined Pakistan's decision to suspend trade makes no dent on India”. Business Today. Retrieved from

Singer, P. (2016). One world now: The ethics of globalization. Yale University Press.

Sorensen, T. C. (2010, March/April) “Dilemmas of Détente: Most Favoured Nation and Less Favorited Nations,” Foreign Affairs.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents (Vol. 500). Norton: New York.

Suneja, K. (2019, August 8). “Trade Suspension will hit Pakistan - Not India: Traders,” The Economic Times.

Suneja, K. (2019, February 16). “Pakistan’s most-favoured nation status scrapped,” The Economic Times. Retrieved from

Tammen, R., Kugler, J., Lemke, D., Stam, A., Abdollahian, M., Al-Sharabati, C., ... & Organski, A. F. K. (2000). Power transitions. New York: Chatham House.

Toye, J. (2010). Development in an interdependent world: old issues, new directions. Background paper for WESS.

Toye, J. & Toye, R. (2004). The UN and Global Political Economy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from

United Nations (2010). “Most Favoured-Nation Treatment” Retrieved from

World Bank Report, (2019). “South Asia Needs More Export to Maintain Growth”. Washington, DC: Rutledge Press, 2019. Retrieved from

Yan, Y. J. (2018), “Interdependence Theory of Development”. Journal of Royal Society, 5(2).



How to Cite

Rashid, Z., & Hilali, A. Z. (2020). Geo-Politics of Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Status under the WTO and Future of Trade between India-Pakistan. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(1), 54–65.



Research Articles | Original Articles | Original Research