Do Pakistani English writers hedge more in linguistics research than native English writers?

Asmara Shafqat; Rafique Ahmed Memon; Tafseer Ahmed Khan

doi:10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.17

Authors

Asmara Shafqat Department of Humanities, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5928-5915
Rafique Ahmed Memon Institute of English Language and Literature, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.
Tafseer Ahmed Khan Department of Computing and Engineering, Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Karachi, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.17

Keywords:

hedging, metadiscourse, academic writing, corpus linguistics, native English writers, Pakistani English Writers

Abstract

The purpose of this corpus-based study is to compare the use of hedges and associated linguistic constituents in the linguistic research articles authored by Pakistani English Writers (PEWs) and native English writers (NEWs). NEWs hedge more than their PEWs peers, as per the outcomes of the two corpora (20 linguistics research articles by PEWs and 20 linguistics research articles by NEWs). Nevertheless, the statistics revealed that both corpora employed hedging types that were quite similar. To minimize the legitimacy of their assertions and arguments, both factions relied primarily on lexical and hedging strategies, and both groups avoided utilizing hedges such as adverbs of frequency. Likewise, neither group used epistemic nor possibility hedging much. Nonetheless, the use of linguistic elements of hedging by PEWs and NEWs authors differ considerably. PEWs are more committed to their opinions being more appealing and persuasive, owing to the clear impact of first language and culture.

References

Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019

Abdollahzadeh, E. (2019). A cross-cultural study of hedging in discussion sections by junior and senior academic writers. Ibérica, 38, 177-202. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/34609

Akbas, E., & Hardman, J. (2018). Strengthening or Weakening Claims in Academic Knowledge Construction: A Comparative Study of Hedges and Boosters in Postgraduate Academic Writing. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(4), 831-859. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0260

Akhter, H., Fareed, M., & Shafqat, A. An Investigation into The Attitude of Urdu Newspaper Readers Towards Language Code-Mixing in Pakistani Urdu Newspapers. JSSIR

Al-Mudhaffari, M., Hussin, S., & HoAbdullah, I. (2020). Interactional strategies in L2 writing: An exploration of hedging and boosting strategies in applied linguistics research articles. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(1), 171-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.20.1.9

Bonyadi, A., Gholami, J. and Nasiri, S., (2012). A contrastive study of hedging in environmental sciences research articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6).1186-1193. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/jltr/vol03/06/17.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.6.1186-1193

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usages. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford University Press.

Chen, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 1-34. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2016-2009/html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-2009

Corney, J.R. (2001). Influence of textual hedging and framing variations on decision making choices pertaining to the climate change issue. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University.

Crompton, P. (2012). Characterising hedging in undergraduate essays by Middle Eastern students. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(2), 55-78.

Demir, C. (2018). Hedging and academic writing: an analysis of lexical hedges. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 74-92. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/43366/528087

EIMalik, A. T., & Nesi, H. (2008). Publishing research in a second language: The Case of Sudanese Contributors to International Medical Journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.007

Falahati, R. (2004). Contrastive study of hedging in English and Farsi academic discourse. Master Thesis, Allarne Tabatabaee University. http://dspace.library.uvic.ca/bitstream/handle/1828/714/falahati_2004.pdf

Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., Kinn, T. (2006). Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines. Benjamins Publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.148

Gomaa, Y.A. (2019). A corpus-based pragmatic analysis of hedging in linguistic master theses abstracts written by Saudi students. Hermes 8(1), 9-81. https://hermes.journals.ekb.eg/article_66028.html

Hassa, A., Kazi, A. S., & Asmara Shafqat, Z. A. The Impact of Process Writing on the Language and Attitude of Pakistani English Learners. Asian EFL Journal, 27(4.3), 260-277.

Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848

Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 15, 29–53.

Hinkel, E. (2009). The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in l1 and l2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 667–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.029

Ho, V. & Li. C. (2018).The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students’ timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001

Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2795–2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3

Hyland, K. (1995). The author in the text: Hedging in scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 33-42. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED390258

Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461445605050365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3

Kafes, H. (2017). An intercultural investigation of meta-discourse features in research articles by American and Turkish academic writers. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(3), 373-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1823

Lakoff, G. (1973). Lexicography and generative grammar I: Hedges and meaning criteria. In Zgusta 1985, 150–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb49487.x

Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004

Maria, S. (1996). Student reactions to tentative language (hedging) in genres of environmental science writing, Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio University.

Markannen, R. & Schroder, H. (1997). Hedging and discourse approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Walter de Gruyte. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110807332

Martín-Martín (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 133-152. https://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/49201

Naugle, W.R. (2011). Native and non-native English speakers’ perceptions of hedging in the oral arguments of civil rights cases, Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University.

Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. Linguistics and the Professions, 8(1), 83-97.

Rezanejad, A., Lari, Z. and Mosalli, Z. (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of the use of hedging devices in scientific research articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1384. http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol06/06/29.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.29

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical english written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2

Salager-Meyer, F. (2011). Scientific discourse and contrastive linguistics: hedging. European Science Editing, 37(2), 35-37.

Shafqat, A., Akhtar, H. (2020).The Correlation Between Field-Dependent And Field-Independent Cognitive Learning Styles And Scanning Information in Text Scores Of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg, 70(2020)2.

Shafqat, A., Arain, F., & Dahraj, M. T. (2020). A Corpus Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers Used in Argumentative Essays by Pakistani Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR201013

Shafqat, A., us Saqlain, N., & Amir, K. S. (2021).Higher Secondary ESL learners and English Conditional Sentences: An investigation of the efficacy of Corpus-Based instruction. The Asian EFL Journal, 28(3.2)

Shafqat, A., & us Saqlain, N. (2019). Relating Perceptual Learning Styles of Engineering Students with Scanning Information in Text Scores. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p257

Sutiah, S., Slamet, S., Shafqat, A., & Supriyono, S. (2020). Implementation of distance learning during the covid-19 pandemic in faculty of education and teacher training. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 15(1), 1204-1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5151

Taweel, A. Q., Saidat, E. M., Rafayah, H. A., & Saidat, A. M. (2011). Hedging in Political Discourse. Linguistics Journal, 5(1)., 169-196. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.417.8920&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Tchizmarova, I. K. (2005). Hedging functions of the Bulgarian discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1143–1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.003

Us Saqlain, N., Shafqat, A., & Hassan, A. (2020). Perception Analysis of English Language Teachers about Use of Contextualized Text for Teaching ESP. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.1), 275-299.

Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6

Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tampere. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/67148

Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0

Yang, Y. (2013). Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.008