Parallel structural patterns in internal linguistic systems of English: an integrated approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.31Keywords:
structural pattern, binarity, ordering constraints, sub-categorical restriction, integrated approach, linguistic systems, pedagogic approachAbstract
This paper reviews the major parallel structural patterns common across all internal linguistic systems despite the fact that important differences exist between the different language systems besides similarities. However, the prevailing pedagogic approaches to treating these internal linguistic systems as mutually exclusive rather than complementary have highlighted the differences by bringing them to the fore and at the same time have obscured and ignored the essential similarities shared by them all. Drawing on Radford’s (2004) reflection that binarity is equally valid and applicable to the constituent structures of phonological and morphological systems and operations along with that of syntax, the present study extends certain other operations primarily discussed and analysed in terms of syntactic constituents to have been equal application and validity in other linguistic systems i.e., phonology, morphology, and lexicology. This study has concentrated on aspects of general structural patterns in three significant patterns such as ‘essential/non-essential dichotomy’, ‘ordering of elements in constituents at all levels, ‘subcategorization’ restrictions on elements of constituents at all levels. It has been concluded that all the features equally apply to all three internal linguistic systems.
References
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. MIT Press.
Bloch, B., & Trager, G. L. (1942). Outline of linguistic analysis. Special Publications of the Linguistic Society of America.
Bloomfield, L. (1983). An introduction to the study of language. Henry Holt and Company.
Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford University.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1995). The theory of principles and parameters. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. Cambridge University.
Cornie, A. (2013). Syntax: a generative introduction (3rd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Hall Jr, R. A. (1968). An essay on language. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED023085
Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Leech, G. N., Deuchar, M., & Hoogenraad, R. (2006). English grammar for today: a new introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Microsoft Encarta. (2007). http://windowsbulletin.com/files/exe/microsoft-corporation/microsoft-encarta-2007-biblioteca-premium
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University.
Radford, A., Atkinson, M., Britain, D., Clahsen, H., & Spencer, A. (2009). Linguistics: an introduction. Cambridge University.
Richards, J. C., Platt, J. T., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Longman Group Limited.
Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology paperback with audio CDs (2): A practical course. Cambridge University.
Robins, R. H. (1971). The structure of language: Language in education. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: an introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace.
Yule, G. (2006). The study of language. Cambridge University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Ishtiaq, Zahid Kamal, Sahibzada Wasim Iqbal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Please click here for details about the Licensing and Copyright policies of IDEA-PG.





