Exploring the solidarity discourse on Islam and Muslims in the Australian press

Authors

  • Muhammad Junaid Ghauri Department of Media and Communication Studies, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-4259
  • Amrat Haq Department of Media and Communication Studies, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-4493
  • Riffat Alam Department of Mass Communication, Karakoram International University, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.4

Keywords:

solidarity discourse, vital centre, civil repair, civil sphere theory, critical discourse, critical discourse analysis, ideological square, lexicalization

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to explore whether and to what extent the Australian newspapers; The Age and The Australian, produced the “solidarity discourse” regarding Islam and Muslims during the time period January 01, 2016 to March 31, 2017. Edward Said’s Orientalism and many other research findings suggest that there is clear evidence of positive in-group (Us/the West/the Occident) and negative out-group (Them/the Islam and Muslims/the East/the Orient) discourse in the representation of Islam and Muslims by global media. However, Jeffery C. Alexander asserts that the media being “communicative institution” of a society plays an important role of “civil repair” by producing a “solidarity discourse”. His civil sphere theory proposes that the media as a “vital centre” highlight and generates common understanding of the solidarity which can resist “non-civil” polarization and radical actions in civil societies. The researcher has employed “Lexicalization” and “Ideological Square” approaches from Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) paradigm proposed by van Dijk. The findings of this study show that The Age produced the “solidarity discourse” overwhelmingly by emphasizing on “understanding”, “cohesion”, and “we-ness”. On the contrary, the “solidarity discourse” is entirely absent in the editorials of The Australian.

References

Alexander, J. C. (1997). The paradoxes of civil society. International Sociology, 12(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026858097012002001

Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University.

Alexander, J. C. (2013). The dark side of modernity. Cambridge University.

Alexander, J. C. (2016). Progress and disillusion: Civil repair and its discontents. Thesis Eleven, 137(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0725513616674405

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2013). Post colonial studies; The key concepts (3rd Ed.). Routledge.

Audit Bureau of Circulations. (2017, February 25). ABC Circulation Results-Feb 2017. https://mumbrella.com.au/abcs-weekend-nationals-grow-circulation-metro-weekly-newspapers-continue-decline-427101

Beauvoir, S. D. (1997). The second sex. (H. M. Parshley, Trans.) Vintage.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, method and practices. USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks.

Forde, K. R. (2015). JCI, civil sphere theory Issue. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 39(2), 111-112. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0196859915581078

Fowler, A. E. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman, 106, 97-117. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED340053.pdf#page=63

Friedland, L. A. (2007). The civil sphere - by Jeffrey C. Alexander. Journal of Communication, 57, 599-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00359_3.x

Ghauri, M. J., Haq, A., & Alam, R. (2021). Exploring the discourse of National Islam and Foreign Islam in the Australian press: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 2(2), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/2.2.22

Hafez, F. (2015). The refugee crisis and Islamophobia. Insight Turkey, 17(4), 19-26. https://www.insightturkey.com/commentaries/the-refugee-crisis-and-islamophobia

Hammersley, M. (1997). On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Language & Communication, 17(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(97)00013-X

Khan, A., Ghauri, M. J., & Alam, R. (2021a). Exploring the ‘civil repair’ function of media: A case study of the Christchurch Mosques shootings. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 2(IV), 467-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2021(2-IV)40

Khan, Z., Ghauri, M. J., & Alam, R. (2021b). Exploring the ‘civil repair’ role of media: A Case study of the Easter bombings in Sri Lanka. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(4), 531-546. https://pssr.org.pk/issues/v5/4/exploring-the-civil-repair-role-of-media-a-case-study-of-the-easter-bombings-in-sri-lanka.pdf

Luengo, M. (2012). Narrating civil society: A new theoretical perspective on journalistic autonomy. Comunicacion Y Sociedad, XXV(2), 29-56. https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/communication-and-society/article/view/36161

Luengo, M., & Ihlebaek, K. A. (2019). Journalism, solidarity and the civil sphere: The case of Charlie Hebdo. European Journal of Communication, 34(3), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323119844411

Poole, E. (2002). Reporting Islam: Media representations of British Muslims. Tauris.

Pratt, M. L. (1985). Scratches on the face of the country; or, What Mr. Barrow Saw in the Land of the Bushmen. Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 119-143. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/448324

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2005). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.

Roy, S. (2009). Media representations and ‘othering’ of the UN in US Media in times of conflict Post 9/11. PhD Thesis, Washington State University.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism. Penguin Books.

Shojaei, A., Youssefi, K., & Hosseini, H. S. (2013). A CDA approach to the biased interpretation and representation of ideologically conflicting ideas in Western Printed Media. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 858-868. http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/jltr/vol04/04/28.pdf

Spivak, G. (1985). ‘The Rani of Simur’. In F. Barker, Europe and Its Others Vol. 1 Proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature. University of Essex.

The Age. (2016, February 23). Trump has none of a president's qualities.

The Age (2016, March 24). Combat evil with courage and solidarity. http://www.nexis.com

The Age. (2016, April 21). Real voices that must be heard.

The Age. (2016, July 6). One Nation should be heard - and rebutted. http://www.nexis.com

The Age. (2016, July 11). Western voices must swell as IS grip slips.

The Age. (2016, September 22). Syrian conflict a damned dilemma. http://www.nexis.com

The Age. (2016, November 17). US refugee deal could quickly come unstuck. http://www.nexis.com

The Age. (2016, November 22). Restraint is right call after bank tragedy.

The Age. (2016, December 18). Indonesia tested by the raging mob.

The Age. (2017). Source information. https://www.nexis.com/results/shared/sourceInfo.do?sourceId=F_GB00NBGenSrch.T25501762415

The Age. (2017, January 31). PM's cowardly stance shames us all. .

The Age. (2017, March 31).Australia must condemn atrocities in Myanmar.

The Australian. (2016, July 16). Jihadist's deadly hit on liberty, equality, fraternity. http://www.nexis.com

The Australian. (2017). Source information. https://www.nexis.com/results/shared/sourceInfo.do?sourceId=F_GB00NBGenSrch.T26708005099

Umber, S., Ghauri, M. J., & Haq, A. (2021). Exploring the othering discourse in the Australian Press. Journal of Media & Communication, 2(1), 52-67. http://jmc.ilmauniversity.edu.pk/arc/Vol2/i1p4

van Dijk, T. (1993). Principals of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0957926593004002006

van Dijk, T. (1995a). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1, 19-27. http://discourses.org/OldArticles/Aims%20of%20Critical%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf

van Dijk, T. (1995b). Discourse analysis as ideological analysis. In C. Schaffine, & A. L. Wenden, Language and peace (pp. 17-33). Routledge.

van Dijk, T. (1998a). Ideology a multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

van Dijk, T. (1998b). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 21-63). Blackwell.

van Dijk, T. (2000). Ethnic minorities and the media, news racism: A discourse analytical approach. Buckingham Open University Press.

van Dijk, T. (2004). Politics, ideology and discourse. In K. B. (Ed.) (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 728-740). Elsevier.

van Dijk, T. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908

Wadumestri. (2010). Being Other: The Experience of Young Australian-Lebanese-Muslims. PhD Thesis, RMIT University, Australia.

Widdowson, H. G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F096394709500400301

Published

2022-02-13

How to Cite

Ghauri, M. J., Haq, A., & Alam, R. (2022). Exploring the solidarity discourse on Islam and Muslims in the Australian press. Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 3(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.4

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.