Impact of sectarian insecurities and terror-driven violence in South Punjab, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/6.2.1Keywords:
Sectarianism, Militancy, Conflict, Terrorism, Sectarian-prone cities, Shia-Sunni divide, Religious extremism, Sectarian conflict, Sectarian disharmonyAbstract
A qualitative study was conducted on sectarian-prone cities in South Punjab, i.e., Sargodha and Jhang, and yielded certain findings. First, in the region of Central and South Asia, wars in the name of religion wedged open the door of sectarian disharmony, which refuses to die. Second, from the 1980s to the 2000s, sectarian disharmony instilled divisions in the domains of political capital and economic resources in South Punjab. Third, the addition of explosive self-controlled jackets, improvised remote-controlled or time-controlled volatile devices and a surfeit of ever-willing suicide bombers, besides target killers, pushed sectarian discord to new limits of terror-driven violence. Fourth, a deep division in the interpretation of religion, such as religious and spiritual scholars, solidified the grounds taken by religious extremists for perpetual dissonance. Fifth, all state efforts to foster sectarian harmony and security still fall short of restoring society to the era of peaceful coexistence. The conclusion drawn is that wars fought near Pakistan’s borders affected society adversely, one example of which is sectarian conflict, causing a perpetual disharmony. No doubt, the state of Pakistan has brought the situation under control, but sectarian divisions in society have gone deeper than before and may take some years to heal.
References
Afzal, S., Iqbal, H., & Inayat, M. (2012). Sectarianism and Its Implications for Pakistan Security: Policy Recommendations Using an Exploratory Study. Journal Of Humanities and Social Science (JHSS), 4(4). http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol4-issue4/D0441926.pdf
Ahmad, M. (2013). Islamization and Sectarian Violence in Pakistan. Intellectual Discourse, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v6i1.417
Bowes, J. (2024, November). Sectarian Violence in Pakistan: Politics, Governance and Ideological Militarism. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/11/20/sectarian-violence-in-pakistan-politics-governance-and-ideological-militarism/
Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013). Theories of International Relations (S. Burchill & A. Linklater, Eds.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Buzan, B. (1991). New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 67(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2621945
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & Wilde, J. d. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publisher.
Chaudhry, Z., & Hussain, K. (2023, March). The economic effects of inter-sectarian contact. Theigc. https://www.theigc.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/Chaudhry%20and%20Hussain%20Working%20paper%20March%202023.pdf
Everett, J. A., & Onu, D. (2013). Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future | Magazine issue 2/2013 - Issue 17 | In-Mind. The Inquisitive Mind. https://www.in-mind.org/article/intergroup-contact-theory-past-present-and-future
Grare, F. (2007, April). The Evolution of Sectarian Conflicts in Pakistan and the Ever-Changing Face of Islamic Violence. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 30(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00856400701264068
Hamza, M. (2020, April). Religious Sectarianism Destroying the Peaceful Image of Islamic Country: A Case Study of Pakistan. papers.ssrn.com. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3574554
Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171
IRFANI, S. (n.d.). Pakistan’s Sectarian Violence: Between the “Arabist Shift” and Indo-Persian Culture. dkiapcss.edu. https://dkiapcss.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/PagesfromReligiousRadicalismandSecurityinSouthAsiach7.pdf
Kappenberg, L. J. (2019, January). National Identity and the Construction of Enemies: Constructivism and Populism. e-IR. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/01/27/national-identity-and-the-construction-of-enemies-constructivism-and-populism/#:~:text=Constructivists%20question%20the%20individualist%20notions,166
Mahadevan, P. (2017, March). Sectarianism in Pakistan (C. Nünlist, Ed.). CSS Analyses in Security Policy, (205). https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/CSSAnalyse205-EN.pdf
McLeod, S. (2023, June). Allport’s Intergroup Contact Hypothesis: Its History and Influence. Simply psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/contact-hypothesis.html
Saqib, H. (2012). Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan make a difficult triangle…. pksecurity.blogspot.com. http://pksecurity.blogspot.com/2012/07/iran-saudi-arabia-and-pakistan-make.html
Shah, M. N. (2014, December). Evolution of Sectarianism in Pakistan: A Threat to the State and Society. South Asian Studies: A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 29(2). https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/csas/PDF/7._Evolution_of_sectarianism_v29_no2_2014.pdf
Wendt, A. (2012). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tehmina Aslam Ranjha, Muhammad Amir Shehzad, Muhammad Asad Aslam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please click here for details about the Licensing and Copyright policies of IDEA-PG.




