Unilateral vs. multilateral approaches in US foreign policy: A case study of Iraq and Afghanistan war
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/2.1.1Keywords:
War on Terror, US War on Terror, US-Iraq Relations, US-Afghan Relations, Afghan War, Iraq War, Post 9/11 US PolicyAbstract
During the US war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Bush administration vindicated its pre-emptive military strikes against Iraq and Afghanistan on the grounds of national security. The strike was carried out under the Bush administration’s National Security Strategy which asserts the right of the US to take unilateral military action against rogue states and terrorist organisations in order to prevent or to reduce an assumed attack by such groups or organisations against the United States. However, the action by the administration has been widely criticised as not being in conformity with international law and United Nations Security Council resolutions. It has been investigated in this research paper that the hidden motive behind the attacks on these two countries was not merely the elimination of the terrorist groups and to stop their activities and to destroy the weapons of mass destruction but also to capture the oil, gas, and other natural resources in order to sustain the fastest growing economy of the US and western countries. The present study provides a comparative analysis of the two approaches, unilateral and multilateral, which were incorporated into US foreign policy with special reference to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
References
Annan. (2004, September 16). Iraq war was illegal and breached UN Charter. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/16/iraq.iraq
Bush, G. W. (2002). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House.
Calkins, A. M. (2000). Multilateralism in international conflict: Recipe for success or failure? Wake Forest University.
Chossudovsky, M. (2010, June 16). The war is worth waging: Afghanistan’s vast reserves of minerals and natural gas. Global Research. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-war-is-worth-waging-afghanistan-s-vast-reserves-of-minerals-and-natural-gas/19769
Davidovic, S. (2002). American foreign policy between unilateralism and multilateralism. Rheinische Friedrich University.
Gupta, S. (2008). The doctrine of pre-emptive strike: Application and implications during the administration of President George W. Bush. International Political Science Review, 29(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192512107085611
Gusev, L. (2012, March 27). The US interests in Afghanistan and Central Asia. Russia and India Report. http://in.rbth.com/articles/2012/03/27/the_us_interests_in_afghanistan_and_central_asia_15276
Kissenger, H. (2001). Does America needs a foreign policy: Towards a diplomacy for the 21st century. Simon and Schuster.
Lieber, R. J. (Ed.). (2002). Eagle rules? foreign policy and American primacy in the twenty-first century. Pearson College Division.
Malik, A. I. (2004). An evaluation of pre-emption in Iraq. Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI) Papers, No. 8. https://ipripak.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ipn8.pdf
Malone, D., & Khong, Y. F. (2003). Unilateralism and US Foreign Policy: International Perspective. Lynne Rienner.
Martin, P. (2001, November 20). US planned war in Afghanistan long before September 11. World Socialist Website. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2001/11/afgh-n20.html
Nichol, J. (2011). Central Asia: Regional developments and implications for US interests. Current Politics and Economics of South, Southeastern and Central Asia, 183.
Nye, J. (2002). The new Rome meets the new Barbarians: How America should wield its power? The Economist, 362, 23-24.
Rabbani, G., & Shahzad, A. (2007). Understanding International Relations. Aemer Publications.
Skidmore, D. (2005). Understanding the unilateralist turn in US foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(2), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00010.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Amna Mahmood, Tatheer Zahra Sherazi, Muhammad Wajeeh Shahrukh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Please click here for details about the Licensing and Copyright policies of IDEA-PG.