A pragma-discourse analysis of language manipulation for suppression: absence of male voice in female writings

Aqsa Naimat

doi:10.47264/idea.lassij/6.2.5

Authors

Aqsa Naimat Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-4239

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/6.2.5

Abstract

The study examines language manipulation to conceal the victimization, suppression, and oppression of males. The dissembled side of the language has been dissected by qualitative data. Two female authors’ Bapsi Sidhwa and Anita Desai, texts were selected and analyzed to find the manipulation of language. Marginalized masculinity theory by Connell (1995) and Fairclough’s (1989) critical discourse analysis model were applied, and thematic analysis as an approach was used. In the second phase, data was analyzed pragmatically using inference and implicature techniques to hit on the hidden side of the story. Findings reveal that language is manipulated to highlight female victimization while concealing male victimization. Female writers frequently use their oppression to blame the male gender. The social interpretation of the text reveals that both genders suffer equally and have equal rights, which should be discussed and highlighted. This study recommends that victimization, suppression, and oppression can also be studied from the male perspective. It will be helpful for future researchers to speak out about the most ignorant and repressed gender in society.

References

Aronson, J. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1995.2069

Archer, L., Pratt, S. D., & Phillips, D. (2001). Working class men's construction of masculinity and negociations of (non) participation in higher education. Gender and Education, 13(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120081779

Atmore, C. (2001). Men as Victims of Domestic Violence. (L. Hendry, Ed.) Domestic Violence and Incest Resource Center. https://1q7dqy2unor827bqjls0c4rn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Men_as_Victims.pdf

Banerjee, R. (2005). Gender identity and the development of gender roles. In S. Ding, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Children's personal and social development (pp. 142–179). Blackwell Publishing. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-00578-005

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. https://lauragonzalez.com/TC/BUTLER_gender_trouble.pdf

Brownell, S., Wasserstrom, J.N., & Laqueur, T.W. (2002). Chinese femininities, Chinese masculinities: A reader. University of California.

Connell, R. W. (2005). Globalization, imperialism, and masculinities in Kimmel. In J. H. M. S (ed.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 71-89). Sage Publication.

Chua, P., & Fujino, D. C. (1999). Negotiating new Asian-American masculinities: Attitudes and gender expectations. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7(3), 391-413. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=sociology_pub

Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859.

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Polity Press. https://www.etnologia.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/hegemonic_masculinity_connell_and_messerschmidt.pdf

Desai, A. (2008). The rooftop Dwellers. In A. Desai (ed.), Collected stories (pp. 155-200). Penguin Random House India.

Desai, A. (2008). Pigeons at daybreak. In A. Desai (ed.), Collected Stories (pp. 295-304). Penguin Random House India.

Derne, S. (2000). Movies, masculinity, and modernity: An ethnography of men's filmgoing in India. Greenwood Press.

England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24(2), 149-66. http://harryganzeboom.nl/teaching/teo/readings/england%20-%202010%20the%20gender%20revolution.pdf

Eagleton, T. (2003). Literary theory. Blackwell Publishers ltd.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language, and power. Cambridge University.

Farrell. W. (1993). The myth of male power: why men are disposable sex part 1. New Male Studies: An International Journal 1(2), 4-33. https://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms/article/view/35/36

Fiebert, M.S. (2004). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 8, 140–176 (2004).

Song, G. (2004). The fragile scholar: Power and masculinities in Chinese culture. Hong Kong University.

Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. Yale University.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Simon & Schuster

Jackson, C., & Dempster, S. (2009). ‘I sat back on my computer… with a bottle of whisky next to me’: Constructing ‘cool’ masculinity through ‘effortless’ achievement in secondary and higher education. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 341-356. https://paa2015.populationassociation.org/papers/152814

Karmarkar, P. R. (2014). An apocalypse and explication: A study on female phase in Elaine Showalter’s towards poetics- an Indian point of view. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(3), 35-31. http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v3(2)/Version-1/G0321035041.pdf

Louie, K. (2002). Theorizing Chinese masculinity: Society and gender in China. Cambridge University. https://www.academia.edu/2016339/Theorising_Chinese_Masculinity

Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of Patriarchy. Oxford University.

Louie, K., & Low, M. (Eds.). (2003). Asian masculinities: The meaning and practice of manhood in China and Japan (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203987933

Morrison, T. (1999). The bluest eye. Vintage.

O’Connor, F. (2019). A good man is hard to find. Faber & Faber.

Oakley, A. (Ed.). (2005). The Ann Oakley reader: Gender, women and social science. Policy Press.

Osella, C., Osella, F., & Chopra, R. (2004). Introduction: Towards a more nuanced approach to masculinity, towards a richer understanding of South Asian Men. South Asian Masculinities: Context of Change, Sites of Continuity, 1-33.

Paletz, M. G. (1995). Neither reasonable nor Responsible: Contrasting representation of masculinity in Malay society. In A. Ong., & M. G. Paletz (ed.), Bewitching women, pious men, gender and body politics in Southeast Asia (pp. 76-123). University of California.

Pascoe, C. (2007). Dude, you are a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. University of California. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263520839_Dude_you're_a_fag_masculinity_and_sexuality_in_high_school

Roberson, J. E., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Men and masculinities in contemporary Japan: Dislocating the Salaryman Doxa. Routledge.

Sidhwa, B. (2015). Ice-candy man. ILQA Publications and Readings Lahore.

Syeda, F. (2018, August 31). Men as Victims of Violence in Partition Fiction. Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Men-as-Victims-of-Violence-in-Partition-Fiction-Syeda/5f87c4a514c694df718cd7213c0b9925da8889e8

Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University.

Todd, A. D., & Fisher S. (1988). Gender and discourse: The power of talk. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Epstein, D. (1998). Real boys don’t work: ‘underachievement’, masculinity, and the harassment of ‘sissies’. In D. Epstein (ed.), Failing boys: Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 96-108). Open University Press.

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. Continuum.

Farrell. W. (1993). The myth of male power: why men are disposable sex part 1. New Male Studies: An International Journal 1(2), 4-33. https://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms/article/view/35/36

Wodak, R. (1997). “I know we won't revolutionize the world with it, but” ... Styles of female leadership in institutions. In H. Kotthoff, & R. Wodak (eds.), Communicating gender in context (pp. 335-370). John Benjamins.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University.