The scale direct shear test effect on the shear strength characteristics of different sands in Lahore, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.ajset/4.2.2Keywords:
Angle of internal friction, cohesion, direct shear test, sand, scale effects, soil mechanics, regression analysis, ASTM standardsAbstract
The direct shear test is a widely used method for determining soil and material shear strength parameters. This study examines the impact of shear box size on the shear strength properties of poorly graded sands collected from Lahore, Pakistan. Sand samples were classified using the Unified Soil Classification System and tested at dry densities ranging from 1.601 to 1.825 g/cm3 using shear boxes with 60 mm, 100 mm, and 160 mm diameters. Tests were performed at a constant rate of 1.25 mm/min under normal stresses of 23.42, 35.76, and 48.11 kPa. Results indicate that increasing box size leads to higher cohesion and lower friction angles, while increasing soil density enhances both parameters. Regression relationships were developed to relate small-scale and large-scale test results. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for scale effects in laboratory shear testing and offer guidance on extrapolating small-scale results to design applications. The study highlights the significance of considering container size effects in the interpretation of laboratory shear tests. Future research may explore varying soil types and moisture contents to generalise these findings further. Understanding these scale effects is crucial for improving the accuracy of geotechnical assessments and ensuring safe construction practices.
References
ASTM International. (2020). Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
Bareither, C. A., Benson, C. H., & Edil, T. B. (2008). Reproducibility of direct shear tests conducted on granular backfill materials. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 31(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100878
Bowles, J. E. (1997). Foundation analysis and design (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Cantor, D., & Ovalle, C. (2025). Sample size effects on the critical state shear strength of granular materials with varied gradation and the role of column-like local structures. Géotechnique, 75(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.23.00032
Cerato, A. B., & Lutenegger, A. J. (2006). Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 29(6), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ13100
Coulomb, C. A. (1776). An attempt to apply the rules of maxima and minima to several problems of stability related to architecture. Académie Royale des Sciences, 7, 343–382.
Deiminiat, A., & Li, L. (2022). Experimental study on the reliability of scaling down techniques used in direct shear tests to determine the shear strength of rockfill and waste rocks. CivilEng, 3(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng3010003
Ingold, T. S. (1982). Some observations on the laboratory measurement of soil-geotextile bond. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 5(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10804J
Jewell, R. A., & Wroth, C. P. (1987). Direct shear tests on reinforced sand. Geotechnique, 37(1), 53–68.
Lambe, T. W., & Whitman, R. V. (1979). Soil mechanics (SI version). Wiley India Pvt. Ltd.
Li, S., Yang, Z., Tian, X., Xiao, Y., Li, X., & Liu, X. (2021). Influencing factors of scale effects in large-scale direct shear tests of soil-rock mixtures based on particle breakage. Transportation Geotechnics, 31, 100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100677
Matthews, M. C. (1988). The engineering application of direct and simple shear testing. Ground Engineering, 21(1), 13–21.
Oyanguren, P. R., Nicieza, C. G., Fernández, M. I. A., & Palacio, C. G. (2008). Stability analysis of Llerin rockfill dam: An in situ direct shear test. Engineering Geology, 100(1–2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.02.009
Parsons, J. D. (1936). Progress report on an investigation of the shearing resistance of cohesionless soils. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 133–138).
Skempton, A. W., & Collin, A. (1949). A note on his pioneer work in soil mechanics. Geotechnique, 1(4), 216–221.
Taylor, D. W., & Leps, T. M. (1938). Shearing properties of Ottawa standard sand as determined by the M.I.T. strain-control direct shearing machine. In Proceedings of the Soils and Foundation Conference of the U.S. Engineer Department (pp. 1–17).
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., & Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Wang, Y. M., Chen, Y. K., & Liu, W. (2008). Large-scale direct shear testing of geocell reinforced soil. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 15(6), 895–900. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11771-008-0163-z
Wu, P. K., Matsushima, K., & Tatsuoka, F. (2008). Effects of specimen size and some other factors on the shear strength and deformation of granular soils in direct shear tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 31(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100773
Wu, L., Qian, J., Xie, L., & Qin, Y. (2023). DEM modeling direct shearing behavior of sand considering anti-rotation of particle. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 8941. https://doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34933-y
Zhao, J., Peng, L., Hao, Z., Wang, J., Wang, D., & Qi, J. (2024). A novel large-scale direct shear apparatus considering size effects on strength of frozen coarse-grained soils. Transportation Geotechnics, 48, 101365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101365
Zhou, Q., Shen, H. H., Helenbrook, B. T., & Zhang, H. W. (2009). Scale dependence of direct shear tests. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54(22), 4337–4348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0516-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iftikhar Ahmad, Zia Ur Rehman, Muhammad Junaid Iqbal, Waheed Ur Rehman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please click here for details about AJSET's Licensing and Copyright policies.
