Protection of civilians in the law of war: A case study of Myanmar
Keywords:Common Article 3, Fourth Geneva Convention 1949, law of war, Myanmar armed conflict, non-international armed conflict, prisoners of war, protection of civilians
The paper is aimed to analyses the Law of War violation in Myanmar. Current communal conflicts in Myanmar among Buddhists and Muslims have cast a pall over the country's transition to democracy. The Rohingya, a Muslim minority group, has been disproportionately affected by the recent round of violence. The Rohingya have been subjected to many human rights violations, which has drawn international attention to the situation. Because the Myanmar government does not recognize Rohingya as a separate ethnic group, they are effectively stateless. Rohingya claim to be indigenous people of Myanmar, despite the government's statements that they came from Bangladesh. The research concludes that as positive as the recent political change has been, the Rohingya's future development does not appear bright. International human rights organizations are urging the global community to pressure Myanmar's administration to amend the Citizenship Law, which effectively makes the Rohingya homeless. The end of this article will give a solution for the Myanmar conflict and protect the Muslim minorities.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Currency. http://www.jumpstartgym.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/viewp/Why-nations-fail-mit-economics.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j
Ahmed, F. B. J. (2018). Rethinking UNHCR and OIC response to forced migration. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 1-26. https://journals.iium.edu.my/shajarah/index.php/shaj/article/view/735/328
Azeem, I. (2016). The Rohingya: Inside Myanmar’s hidden genocide. C. Hurst.
Bergsmo, M., & Tianying, S. O. N. G. (Eds.). (2018). Military Self-Interest in Accountability for Core International Crimes (Vol. 25). Torkel Opsahl Academic Publisher.
Crossman, L. (2014). Myanmar's Rohingya Refugees the Search for Human Security. Georgetown University.
de Mersan, A. (2018). Ritual and issues of ethnic integration in the borderlands of the State of Rakhine/Arakan (Myanmar). In Routledge Handbook of Asian Borderlands (pp. 151-161). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688978-15
d'Hubert, T. (2018). In the Shade of the Golden Palace: ?l?ol and Middle Bengali Poetics in Arakan. Oxford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190860332.001.0001
de Chazournes, L. B., & Condorelle, L. (2000, March 31). Common article 1 of the Geneva Conventions Revisited: Protecting collective interests. ICRC. https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/article/other/57jqcp.htm
Fleck, D. (Ed.). (2021). The handbook of international humanitarian law. Oxford University.
Fong, J. (2008). Revolution as Development: The Karen Self-Determination Struggle Against Ethnocracy (1949-2004). BrownWalker.
Harroff-Tavel, M. (1993, June 30). Action taken by the International Committee of the Red Cross in situations of internal violence. ICRC. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/article/other/57jmhy.htm
Henckaerts, J. M. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume 1, Rules (Vol. 1). Cambridge University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700
Isti'anah, A. (2018). Rohingya in media: Critical discourse analysis of Myanmar and Bangladesh newspaper headlines. Language in the Online and Offline World, 6, 18-23. http://repository.usd.ac.id/id/eprint/25962
Jacob, C. (2014). Practising civilian protection: Human security in Myanmar and Cambodia. Security Dialogue, 45(4), 391-408. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0967010614535831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614535831
Jacob, C. (2016). Civilian protection in the Twenty-first Century. Oxford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199467501.001.0001
Jaythoum, M. A. (2020). The legal value of common article third of the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 15538-15548. https://www.archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/6407
Khan, A., & Hussain Shah Jillani, M. A. (2019). Killer Robots and Their Compliance with the Principles of Law of War. Journal of Law and Society, 1(75). 55. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jlsup50&div=12&id=&page=
Kipgen, N. (2014). Addressing the Rohingya problem. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(2), 234-247. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0021909613505269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613505269
Kofi Annan Foundation. (2017, August 24). Advisory commission on Rakhine STATE: Final report. Kofi Annan Foundation. https://www.kofiannanfoundation.org/mediation-and-crisis-resolution/rakhine-final-report/
Lane, L. (2016). Mitigating humanitarian crises during non-international armed conflicts: The role of human rights and ceasefire agreements. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 1(1), 1-19. https://jhumanitarianaction.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41018-016-0002-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-016-0002-z
Lut, Z. (2021). Armed Conflict, Internally Displaced Persons, and protection mechanism in Kachin State case study: Laiza, Myanmar-China border, Kachin state, Myanmar.
MacInnis, L. (2007, June 29). International red cross Issues rare Myanmar censure. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL28287051
McPherson, P. (2018, September 5). Rohingya protesters call for freedom FOR jailed reporters in Myanmar. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-rohingya-protesters-call-for-freedom-for-jailed-reporters-in-myanmar
Menager, J. (2017). Myanmar's New Generation: A study of elite young people in Yangon, 2010 to 2016. Menager, J. (2017). Myanmar's New Generation: A study of elite young people in Yangon, 2010 to 2016. Autsralian National University. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/144288
Meron, T. (1996). The continuing role of custom in the formation of international humanitarian law. American Journal of International Law, 90(2), 238-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203686
Mohdin, A. (2019). A brief history of the word “Rohingya” at the heart of a humanitarian crisis. Quartz. https://qz.com/1092313/a-brief-history-of-the-word-rohingya-at-the-heart-of-a-humanitarian-crisis/
Olumhense, E. (2017, December 26). Rohingya refugees in Chicago face stress, anxiety after Escaping horrors in Myanmar. Chicago Tribune. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-rohingya-refugees-chicago-20171209-story.html
Sassòli, M., Bouvier, A. A., & Quintin, A. (2011). How does law protect in war? ICRC.
Shesterinina, A., & Job, B. L. (2016). Particularized protection: UNSC mandates and the protection of civilians in armed conflict. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 240-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2015.1123628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2015.1123628
Sivakumaran, S. (2012). The law of non-international armed conflict. Oxford University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199239795.001.0001
Story, I. (2012, August 15). The Rohingya: A humanitarian crisis. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/program/inside-story/2012/8/15/the-rohingya-a-humanitarian-crisis .
Susetyo, H. (2019). International Humanitarian Law in internal armed conflict: Implementing common article 3 and additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions to internal and horizontal conflicts in Indonesia. terAs Law Review, 3(4). 751-781. https://www.trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/teras-Lrev/article/view/5411
Winminton. (2012). A legal study of the notion of Internal Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law and Myanmar. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University Graduate School.
Wilmshurst, E., & Breau, S. (Eds.). (2007). Perspectives on the ICRC study on customary international humanitarian law. Cambridge University.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Ahmed Arafa A. Hammad, Guo Dexiang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing & Copyright Policies
Articles in LASSIJ-IDEA are Open Access contents published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) http://
The copyright policy of LASSIJ-IDEA is based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but author(s) are free to subsequently publish their work. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
The users may use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article(s) provided that the author(s) are attributed as the original creators and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes, i.e., research or other educational use. Authors are encouraged to familiarise themselves with the various creative commons licenses.