Promotional practices in mission and vision statements of corporate companies: A systemic functional linguistic analysis




mission statements, systemic functional linguitics, genre, promotional genre, genre analysis, transitivity theory, corporate discourse, vision statements


Promotional strategies have become discursive practices in corporate companies’ mission and vision statements. However, less focus was given to the role of grammar in shaping this text type as part of promotional discourse. Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is arguably the most definite and certain linguistic analysis as a meaning-making resource. Hence, the purpose of this study was to use transitivity grammar theory in SFL to analyse the use of experiential processes in enacting promotional rhetorical moves. Following purposive sampling, mission and vision statements of hundred international companies, which were ranked by current market capitalization, were selected. Using textual analysis, we applied transitivity grammar theory to manually analyse promotional rhetorical moves. The results were quantified and presented in tabulation form. The findings revealed that mental and relational processes are favoured grammatical patterns used by corporate firms to write mission statements that focus on building public image and establish self-concept. The findings of this research can prove helpful for other corporate companies to use similar grammatical patterns to develop mission and vision statements.


Metrics Loading ...


Allison, J. (2017). Advancing strategic communication through mission statements: Creation of a natural language taxonomy. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 1-9.

Ahmad, N. N. & Masroor, F. (2020). The study of generic patterns of mission and vision statements of the universities. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(2), 159-178. DOI:

Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres — the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 723-742. DOI:

Bartkus, B., Glassman, M., & McAfee, B. (2006). Mission statement quality and financial performance. European Management Journal, 24(1), 86-94. https://doi:10.1016/j.emj.2005.12.010 DOI:

Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Palgrave MacMillan. DOI:

Benelhadj, F. (2019). Discipline and genre in academic discourse: Prepositional phrases as a focus. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 190-199. https://doi.or/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.010 DOI:

Bhatia, V.K. (1983). An applied discourse analysis of English legislative writing. The University of Aston Language Studies Unit.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. A&C Black.

Bittencourt, T., & Willetts, A. (2018). Negotiating the tensions: A critical study of international schools’ mission statements. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(4), 515-525. doi:10.1080/14767724.2018.1512047 DOI:

Boerema, A. J. (2006). An analysis of private school missions statements. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 180-202. DOI:

Breznik, K., & Law, K. M. (2019). What do mission statements reveal about the values of top universities in the world? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(5), 1362-1375. DOI:

Campbell, A., Devine, M. and Yeung, D. (1991). A sense of mission. Pitman Publishing.

Christensen, L. T., & Askegaard, S. (2001). Corporate identity and corporate image revisited: A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3–4), 292–315. DOI:

David, F., Ali, A., & Al-Aali, A. (2011). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Education Ltd.

David, M.E., & David, F.R. (2014). Mission statement theory and practice: A content analysis and new direction. International Journal of Business, Marketing and Decision Sciences, 7(1), 95-110.

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Primary English Teaching Association.

Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, and practices. Harper & Row.

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nded.). A & C Black.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2015). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. DOI:

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourses: The universities. Discourse & Society 4(2), 133–168. DOI:

Gleason, J. (2014). Meaning-based scoring: A systemic functional linguistics model for automated test tasks. Hispania, 97(4), 666-688. DOI:

Goertzen, P., &Kristjánsson, C. (2007). Interpersonal dimensions of community in graduate online learning: Exploring social presence through the lens of systemic functional linguistics. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 212-230. DOI:

Hafferty, F. W., Grbic, D., &Hafferty, P. K. (2019). Mapping the mission statements of U.S. LCME-Accredited medical schools. Academic Medicine, 94(5), 723-730. DOI:

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

Hasan, R. (2009). The place of context in a systemic functional model. In M.A.K. Halliday and J. Webster (Eds.). Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics (pp.166-189). Continuum.

Hayden, M. J. (2012). Mission statement possible: International schools and cosmopolitanism. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 11(2), 5–26.

Holland, J. J., & Nichele, E. (2016). An ideological content analysis of corporate manifestos: A foundational document approach. Semiotica, 208, 79-101. DOI:

Hongwei, He. (2012). Corporate identity anchors: A managerial cognition perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 46(5), 609–625. DOI:

Jason, L. A. & Glenwick, D. S. (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Oxford University. DOI:

Kemp, S., & Dwyer, L. (2003). Mission statements of international airlines: A content analysis. Tourism Management, 24(6), 635–653. DOI:

Khalifa, A.S. (2011). Three f’s for the mission statement: What’s next? Journal of Strategy and Management, 4(1), 25-43. DOI:

Koller, V. (2009) Corporate self-presentation and self-centredness: A case for cognitive critical discourse analysis. In H. Pishwa (Eds.). Language and social cognition expression of the social mind (p. 267-288). Mouton de Gruyter Berlin.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods & techniques. New Age International.

Li, J. (2010). Transitivity and lexical cohesion: Press representations of a political disaster and its actors. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3444-3458. DOI:

Lin, Y. H., Ryan, C., Wise, N., & Low, L. W. (2018). A content analysis of airline mission statements: Changing trends and contemporary components. Tourism Management Perspectives, 28, 156-165. DOI:

Martin, J., & White, P. R. (2007). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Springer.

Martinez, I. A. (2001). Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 227-247. DOI:

Mason, M. & Mason, R.D. (2012). Communicating a green corporate perspective: Ideological persuasion in the corporate environmental report. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 479-506. DOI:

Ozdem, G. (2011). An Analysis of the mission and vision statements on the strategic plans of higher education institutions. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 1887- 1893.

Pearce, J. A., & David, F. (1987). Corporate mission statements: The bottom line. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(2), 109-115. DOI:

Pho, P. D. (2008) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies 10(2): 231-250. DOI:

Ravelli, L. (2000). Getting started with functional analysis of texts. In Len Unsworth (Ed.). Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 27-64).Cassell& Co.

Rego, A., Araújo, B., & Serrão, D. (2015). The mission, vision and values in hospital management. Journal of Hospital Administration, 5(1). DOI:

Rozycki, E.G. (2004). Mission and vision in education. Educational Horizons, 82(2), 94-98.

Swales, J. (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University.

Swales, J. M., & Rogers, P. S. (1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse and Society, 6(2), 223-242. DOI:

Thompson, G. (2000) Introducing functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Vathanalaoha, K., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Genre analysis of experiment-based dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 1-14. DOI:

Velcoff, J., & Ferrari, J. (2006). Perceptions of university missi¬on statement by senior administrators: Relating to faculty en¬gagement. Christian Higher Education, 5(4), 329-339. DOI:



How to Cite

Aib, I., Shehzad, W., & Irshad, S. (2021). Promotional practices in mission and vision statements of corporate companies: A systemic functional linguistic analysis. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 5(1), 630–647.