US-Taliban Peace Agreement: A Study of Economic and Strategic Implications for Pakistan

Authors

  • Asif Salim Department of Political Science, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan.
  • Raid Khan Department of International Relations, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Zikriya Department of Pakistan Studies, Islamia College University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/3.2.18

Abstract

The competition among the regional stake-holders cannot be neglected because they can sabotage the peace process by delaying the focused intra-afghan dialogue. It is, therefore, argued that only Afghans can dilute the influence of external actors and keep them away from interfering in the internal politics of Afghanistan. Without the active participation of Pakistan objectives for durable and long-standing peace cannot be achieved. Pakistan not only provided its good-offices for the negotiation between the parties at different forums but also influenced and persuaded the Taliban factions for negotiations. The question arises that what will be the implications of this deal on Pakistan and how it can play plank the fruitful outcomes from this deal. The results shows that the deal between the US and Taliban has deep-down strategic and economic implications on Pakistan and with better strategy Pakistan can create win-win situation for the other regional stakeholders.  Furthermore, the current research is qualitative in nature in which the empirical data and popular literature have critically analyzed to understand the peace agreement in Afghanistan with its different dimensions and perspectives. Policy recommendations are the part of discussion, however paper focuses fundamentally on possible ramifications of Doha peace deal.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2020-10-27

How to Cite

Salim, A., Khan, R., & Zikriya. (2020). US-Taliban Peace Agreement: A Study of Economic and Strategic Implications for Pakistan . Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 3(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/3.2.18