Politics on Campus: Why do Students Join Campus Politics in Islamabad?





Student Politics, Peer Suggestion, Ethnic Affiliation, Academic Environment, Perceived Status, Power Deficit


Education has been an extensively researched area as an important resource of political participation across the globe. However, politics on campus has been an under-researched in South Asia including Pakistan. This study was set forth to explore the factors responsible for the involvement of students in politics at the campus. The present study was conducted under positivist epistemology in three randomly selected public sector universities in Islamabad city, Pakistan. A sample of 396 proportionately selected male students was drawn from the selected universities. A self-constructed questionnaire was employed in the survey to collect the data. Alpha reliability of the subscales was calculated and found appropriate to use. Factors including peer suggestion, ethnic affiliation, academic environment, political culture, political socialization, perceived status and power deficit were tested to find out their association. The Pearson correlational analysis confirmed the association of all the variables. It can be concluded that all the above seven variables are persuading students to join politics on campus and participate in political activities.


Adorno, T. W., Frenckel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.

Altbach, P. G. (1968). Student politics in Bombay (Vol. 3). Asia Publishing House.

Altbach, P. G. (1993). The dilemma of change in Indian higher education. Higher Education, 26(1), 3-20.

Aqsa, K., Riaz, W. & Saleem, Z. (2017). The effectiveness of games in English language learning at elementary level in government schools. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 1(2), 12-23.

Baltzell, E. D. (1976). The Protestant establishment revisited. The American Scholar, 45(4), 499-518.

Barabas, J., & Jerit, J. (2004). Redistricting principles and racial representation. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4(4), 415-435.

Beaumont, E., Colby, A., & Ehrlich, T. Torney-Purta, 1. (2006). Promoting political competence and engagement in college students. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(3), 249-170.

Brass, D. J., & Krackhardt, D. M. (2012). Power, politics, and social networks in organizations. Politics in organizations: Theory and research considerations. Rutledge.

Campbell, C., & Converse, P. (1954). Miller, and Stokes. 1960. The American voter.

Cigler, A. J., & Joslyn, M. (2002). Groups, social capital, and democratic orientations. Interest group politics. CQ Press.

Colby, A., Beaumont, E., Ehrlich, T., & Corngold, J. (2010). Educating for democracy: Preparing undergraduates for responsible political engagement (Vol. 19). John Wiley & Sons.

Connell, R. W., Dowsett, G. W., Kessler, S., & Ashenden, D. J. (1981). Class and gender dynamics in a ruling-class school. Interchange, 12(2-3), 102-117.

Dalton, R. J. (1982). The pathways of parental socialization. American Politics Quarterly, 10(2), 139-157.

Dalton, R. J. (1988). Citizen politics in Western democracies: public opinion and political parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and France. Chatham House Publishers.

Einfeld, A., & Collins, D. (2008). The relationships between service-learning, social justice, multicultural competence, and civic engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 95-109.

Eveland Jr, W. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17(3), 215-237.

Finlay, A. K., & Flanagan, C. (2013). Adolescents' civic engagement and alcohol use: Longitudinal evidence for patterns of engagement and use in the adult lives of a British cohort. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 435-446.

Flacks, R. (1967). The Liberated Generation: An Exploration of the Roots of Student Protest 1. Journal of Social Issues, 23(3), 52-75.

Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217-234.

Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65-95.

Jayaram, N. (1979). Sadhus no longer: Recent trends in Indian student activism. Higher Education, 8(6), 683-699.

Kahne, J., & Middaugh, E. (2008). High quality civic education: What is it and who gets it? Social Education, 72(1), 34.

Keniston, K. (1967). The sources of student dissent. Journal of Social Issues, 23(3), 108-137.

Khan, N. U. & Rehman, A. U. (2018). National character and leadership in Pakistan: challenges and response. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 10(2), 57-71.

Klobus-Edwards, P., Edwards, J. N., & Klemmack, D. L. (1978). Differences in social participation: Blacks and whites. Social Forces, 56(4), 1035-1052.

Kraut, R. E., & Lewis, S. H. (1975). Alternate models of family influence on student political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(5), 791-800.

Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., Steel, H., & Burgum, S. (2015). Campus politics, student societies and social media. The Sociological Review, 63(4), 820-839.

Marschall, M. J., & Stolle, D. (2004). Race and the city: neighbourhood context and the development of generalized trust. Political Behaviour, 26(2), 125-153.

Mazo, E., & Hess, S. (1968). Nixon; a Political Portrait (Vol. 75, No. 8077). Harper & Row.

McMillan, J., & Harriger, K. (2002). College students and deliberation: A benchmark study. Communication Education, 51(3), 237-253.

Miller, K. A., Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1985). Educational self-direction and the cognitive functioning of students. Social Forces, 63(4), 923-944.

Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140-155.

Peterson, S. A. (1990). Political Behaviour: Patterns in everyday life (Vol. 177). SAGE.

Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95-112.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223-234). Palgrave Macmillan.

Rodriguez, C. M., Routh, D. K. (1989). Depression, anxiety and attributional style in learning disabled and non-learning disabled children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 299-304.

Teorell, J. (2003). Linking social capital to political Participation: Voluntary associations and networks of recruitment in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(1), 49-66.

Thomas, L. E. (1971). Political attitude congruence between politically active parents and college-age children: An inquiry into family political socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33(2), 375-386.

Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2005). The sociology of emotions. Cambridge University.

Van-den-Berghe, P. L. (1973). Power and privilege at an African university. Transaction.

Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. University of Chicago.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University.

Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? Yale University.

Wolsfeld, Gadi. (1986). Political action repertoires: The role of efficacy. Comparative Political Studies, 19(1), 104-129.

Yeoh, E. K. K. (2006). Ethnic coexistence in a pluralistic campus environment. Geo Journal, 66(3), 223-241.



How to Cite

Ahmad, A. (2020). Politics on Campus: Why do Students Join Campus Politics in Islamabad?. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(2), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/4.2.5



Research Articles | Original Articles | Original Research