Sectarian Divide as a Cause of Protracted Conflict: A Case of Syria (2011-18)

Authors

  • Muhammad Tayyab Department of Peace & Conflict Studies, National Defence University (NDU), Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Shahid Ahmad Afridi Department of Peace & Conflict Studies, National Defence University (NDU), Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Maria Hamid Department of Peace and Conflict Studies, National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/4.2.23

Keywords:

Conflict Resolution, Protracted Social Conflict, Communal Violence, Sectarianism

Abstract

Since the people’s uprising in 2011 against the authoritarian regime of Bashar Al Assad and its oppressive policies, Syria is entangled in a long spiral of violent conflict. Though a number of factors explain the violent nature of war and its longevity, however sectarianism proved to be the most significant and the most dominant factors of all. The dominancy of minority Alawite community in the country led to the discrimination against other sects especially the Sunni majority, comprising 74 percent of the total population. Such prejudices against Sunnis and other sects have pitched Syrian people against the regime which evolved into a long and sectarian civil war that dominates the Syrian society till date. Applying Protracted Social Conflict Model, this paper tries to answer the question that how sectarianism played a role in the perpetuation of the Syrian civil war during 2011-2018. Using qualitative methods of analysis, the paper endeavours to dig out the roots of the current violent conflict in the country. For data collection and analysis, secondary sources in the form of books, research articles and other internet sources have been consulted in an attempt to analyse what is unknown on the basis of what is known.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Tayyab, M., Afridi, S. A., & Hamid, M. (2020). Sectarian Divide as a Cause of Protracted Conflict: A Case of Syria (2011-18). Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/4.2.23